Comments for Internet Alchemy http://blog.iandavis.com Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:53:58 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ Comment on Introducing Embedded RDF by Como semantizar textos – Parte 1 – (Los formatos RDF) | Círculo de Maquetadores http://blog.iandavis.com/2005/10/19/introducing-embedded-rdf/#comment-1332 Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:53:58 +0000 http://innovateer.wordpress.com/2005/10/19/introducing-embedded-rdf#comment-1332 [...] la información sobre eRDF en el blog de Ian Davis. Esta entrada fue publicada en HTML, Semántica Web y etiquetada eRDF, HTML, RDF, RDFa, [...]

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by windows web hosting http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1268 Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:06:09 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1268 Great post; something I find frustrating sometimes in discussions about RDF/Linked Data being worthwhile or not, is the focus on the technology, to the neglect of its purpose: connecting data.

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by A Different Way to Think about RDF - semanticweb.com http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1267 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:01:35 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1267 [...] Davis recently sketched out an “alternate way of thinking about RDF, one that is resource-oriented rather than triple-oriented.” He writes, “The Resource [...]

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by Vuk Miličić (@faviki) http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1262 Mon, 28 Nov 2011 01:19:28 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1262 A shorter version:
RDF (Resource Description Framework) is used for describing various things. A thing can be described with properties that have literal values or by relationships to other things. It is used on the Web, so it’s important that names of both things and relations have globally unique names, i.e. URIs.

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by bobdc http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1261 Sun, 27 Nov 2011 16:04:14 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1261 How’s this: “While RDF does not require that resource classes, relationships, or properties be declared somewhere before you use them, doing so using the RDFS or OWL standards can provide additional metadata about your resources that aids interoperability between different applications using similar data”.

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by iand http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1260 Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:07:46 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1260 This formulation would lend itself to alternate types of querying, such as templated “fill in the blanks of a resource”.

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by iand http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1259 Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:06:44 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1259 What kind of RDFS/OWL do you think would be appropriate?

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by iand http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1258 Sun, 27 Nov 2011 15:06:21 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1258 I disagree. They arise from other resource descriptions having relationships with this one. Technically there is not difference, but it’s much easier to understand that you are describing a resource, its properties and its relationships _to_ other things.

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by glenn mcdonald http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1256 Sun, 27 Nov 2011 14:29:46 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1256 But the unidirectionality of relationship assertions in the current formulation of RDF is ANOTHER significant difficulty in use! I continue to believe that a better abstraction would present relationships in both directions interchangeably and transparently.

]]> Comment on Sketch of a Reformulation of RDF by Christopher Gutteridge http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1255 Sun, 27 Nov 2011 14:23:07 +0000 http://blog.iandavis.com/2011/11/26/sketch-of-a-reformulation-of-rdf/#comment-1255 I think the above description has a flaw in that it is forward relationship biased. Maybe also needs …

Zero or more relationships to it, coming from other resources.

]]>